Why adoption is outrunning readiness — and what to do about it.
Get the full report.
Tell us where to send it and what your role is. The download opens on the next page.
That email address didn't look right. Check it and try again.
Three fields, nothing more. Your name lets us say hello; your role tells us what to send you next — nothing else.
Want the short version first? The 10-page Executive Edition is free to read — no email needed.
Nine sections, eleven exhibits, and a twelve-month agenda — built for the executives who approve healthcare AI investment and own the operating and patient result.
The adoption and scaling evidence shows that buying and deploying AI is easier than building the capacity to sustain operating improvement and patient benefit. The consequence is a growing portfolio of pilots, rework, and risk without durable improvement in care.
One survey found 85% of US healthcare leaders exploring or adopting generative AI, while a separate comparison places the sector below the cross-industry average for data and AI maturity. The measures are not interchangeable: one captures appetite; the other describes delivery capacity.
Only 21% of companies planning agentic AI within two years report mature agent governance. Weak agentic governance exposes patients to unsafe decisions; weak adoption withholds the benefit the system was meant to create.
The ARC Readiness Assessment uses roughly 35 organization-specific questions across Data Strategy, Change Management, and AI Governance. It returns three things a board can act on: the stage the organization can safely absorb, the weakest of the three pillars, and the first evidence-backed fix required before the next AI deployment.
Gartner expects task-specific agents in 40% of enterprise applications by the end of 2026. Readiness determines whether an organization negotiates that future or accepts it on a vendor's terms.
Quantitative claims come from published sources with their population qualifiers attached; field observations are labeled as such and are not presented as survey evidence; 2028 statements remain predictions, not measured outcomes. Every source is listed at the back of the report.
Each one is placed at the point of first reference in the report, with what it does not show printed alongside it.
Exhibits are reproduced from the report as published. Reproducing an exhibit, in whole or in part, requires written permission. © 2026 Artha Consulting Lab.
Get the ARC white paper first when it releases, and an invitation to a complimentary 30-minute readiness conversation.
Join the reader list.
Research as it publishes. No campaign sequence, and one click to leave.
That email address didn't look right. Check it and try again.
Already downloaded the report? You're on the list — this is for readers who want the white paper without the 51 pages.
The report explains the architecture. The assessment turns it into a measured picture of your organization — the stage you can absorb, the weakest pillar, and the first fix.
See where you stand ↗Thirty minutes, on your calendar, no forms in between.
Prefer email? ankur.jain@arthaconsultinglab.com